Research Article

Evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Biosurfactant against ESBL producing bacterial isolates

B. Madhumathi1, D. Jegadeeshkumar1, M. Anitha2, N. Kannan2 and Chandrasekaran2

Published 09/30/2017 .
Email: jegadeeshkumar2@gmail.com

Evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Biosurfactant against ESBL producing bacterial isolates

B. Madhumathi1, D. Jegadeeshkumar1, M. Anitha2, N. Kannan2 and Chandrasekaran2

 

1Chromopark, Namakkal, Tamilnadu, India.

2Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Selvamm Arts and Science College, Namakkal, Tamilnadu, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed/E-Mail: jegadeeshkumar2@gmail.com

Received: Sep 2017 / Accepted: Sep 2017/ Published: Sep 2017

ABSTRACT: In this present study, the biosurfactant producing ability of the microorganisms isolated from the soil samples was investigated by blue agar plate, oil spreading test and emulsification index. Among the 15 of them, the best isolate was identified as B.cereus based on microscopic and biochemical analysis. Our aim of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of biosurfactant against ESBL producing P.aeruginosa isolates. Susceptibility tests were performed by the agar well diffusion method. Among the 5 ESBL isolates, 3 of them were inhibited by biosurfactant. The zone of inhibition ranged from 12 mm to 22 mm and MIC was 10mg/ml. This effect is comparable to antibiotics and therefore the future use of this biosurfactant as broad spectrum antibiotics are highly promising.

Keywords: Biosurfactant, B.cereus, emulsification index, ESBL, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,ABS

 

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotic resistances are a public health problem in all parts of the world. New resistance mechanisms are emerging and spreading globally, threatening our ability to treat common infectious diseases. This phenomenon was mostly promoted by incorrectly prescribed antibiotics, duration of antibiotic therapy also contribute the development of resistance.

In most cases, antibiotic-resistant infections require prolonged and/or costlier treatments, extend hospital stays, necessitate additional doctor visits and health care use, and result in greater disability and death compared with infections that are easily treatable with antibiotics. In this situation, urgently we need to investigate for newer drugs with lesser resistance. Drugs derived from natural sources play a significant role in the prevention and treatment of human diseases. Concerning the above facts, it is worthwhile to screen microbes which have the above properties to synthesize new drugs (Nascimento et al., 2000).

The production of antimicrobial substances seems to be a general phenomenon for the bacteria, this meritorious array of microbial defense systems are produced, including broad-spectrum classical antibiotics metabolic by-products (Motta et al., 2004). In addition, microbes produce surface active agents, which possess a number of advantages such as low toxicity, effective on a wide range of pH values and temperatures (Christova et al., 2007). This surface active agent is also called as Biosurfactant. This biosurfactant may have one of the following structures: mycolic acid, glycolipids, polysaccharide–lipid complex, lipoprotein, or lipopeptide and phospholids (Karanth, 1999). 

Among the various categories of biosurfactants the glycolipid biosurfactants “rhamnolipids” stand apart. Rhamnolipids biosurfactants show several useful properties for the processing industries. This Biosurfactant possess that capable of inhibiting the microbes such as bacteria and fungi (Magalhae, 2013). Number of authors reported the antimicrobial activity of Biosurfactant against gram negative and positive bacteria but no one inhibit the ESBL producing isolates with P.aeruginosa producing Biosurfactant. 

Against these backdrops, this study was aimed at isolating and screening of biosurfactants producing microorganisms from oil contaminated soil samples and its active against ESBL producing isolates.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pathogenic isolates

The Multidrug resistance isolates of UTI causing Pseudomonas aeruginosa were procured from Microtech, Microbiology Laboratory and Coimbatore and used for the study. All isolates were confirmed to UTI chromogenic agar media.

 

PCR amplification for detection of beta lactamase genes from food samples

All isolates were screened for the resistance genes SHV, TEM, CTX-M, and OXA by a multiplex PCR assay using Hong Fang et al., (2008) procedure. The plasmid DNA was separated according to procedure of Sathasivam and Manickam (1996). PCR amplification reactions were performed in a volume of 25 µl containing 12.5 µl of 2x Promega PCR Master Mix (USA), 0.2 µM concentrations of each primer (1 µl), 2 µl of plasmid DNA template and make up 25 µl with molecular grade water. The cycling parameters were as follows: an initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 90 s, and 72°C for 60 s; and with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis at 1.5% agarose gel in 1XTBE buffer. A 100 bp ladder molecular weight marker was used to measure the molecular weights of amplified products.

 

Collection of soil samples

            Surface sediment samples were collected from oil contaminated sites in Namakkal area. Soil samples were collected from10 different points in the oil contaminated site using a sterile stainless steels spatula. The collected samples were pooled and transferred to sterilized plastic container and transported at 4°C to the laboratory and maintained at 4°C until analysis.

 

Screening of bacterial isolates from oil contaminated soil

            The serially diluted soil samples were spread on BHA plates overlaid with 100 μl of Hydrocarbon (Crude oil) and were incubated at 25°C for 14 days. Any isolate which grew on BHA plate were confirmed as degraders.  After, such colonies were inoculated into NA plates and incubate at 24hrs to 48hrs and store at 4°C for further work. (Mamitha et al., 2013).

 

Selection of efficient isolates

Isolates were subjected to blue agar plate method. Mineral salt agar medium supplemented with glucose as carbon source (2%) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB: 0.2 mg/ml) and methylene blue (MB: 0.2 mg/ml) were used to detect extracellular anionic glycolipid production (Siegmund and Wagner, 1991). Biosurfactants were observed by the formation of dark blue halos around the colonies.

 

Oil spreading assay

The culture suspension was screened for biosurfactant production (Anandaraj and Thivakaran, 2010). Twenty millilitre (20ml) of distilled water was taken in the Petri plate. One milliliter (1ml) of crude oil was added at the centre of the plates containing water. Then twenty micro litre (20µl) of the supernatant of the culture was added to the centre. If biosurfactant is present in the cell free culture broth, the oil will be displaced with an oil free clearing zone and diameter of this clearing zone indicates the surfactant activity, also called oil displacement activity. A negative control was maintained with distilled water (without surfactant), in which no oil displacement or clear zone was observed.

 

Emulsification index (E24)

The emulsifying capacity was evaluated by an emulsification index (E24). The culture sample was determined by adding 2 ml of crude oil and 2 ml of the cell-free broth in a test tube, vortexed at high speed for 2 min and allowed to stand for 24h. The E24 index is given as percentage of the height of the emulsified layer (cm) divided by the total height of the liquid column (cm). The percentage of emulsification index was calculated by using the following equation (Cooper and Goldenberg, 1987).

                                                         Height of the emulsion layer

Emulsification index (E24) =     -------------------------------          X 100

                                                           Total height

 

Production and extraction of biosurfactant (Anandaraj and Thivakaran, 2010)

                  The culture was inoculated in 50ml of bushnell haas broth with 1ml of crude oil. The culture was incubated at 27°C for 8 days with shaking condition. After incubation the bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation at 5000rpm, 4°C for 20 minutes. The supernatant was taken and the pH of the supernatant was adjusted to 2, using 1M H2SO4. Now add equal volume of chloroform: methanol (2:1). This mixture was shaken well for mixing and poured into a sterile Petri plate, then left overnight for evaporation. White colored sediments were obtained as a result, i.e., the Biosurfactant. They were placed in the hot air oven for drying at 100° C for 30 minutes. After drying the plates were weighed. The dry weight of the biosurfactants was calculated by the following formula:

Dry weight of biosurfactant = (Weight of the plate after drying -weight of empty plate).

 

Antibacterial assay

The MHA plates were inoculated with freshly prepared overnight inoculums which were swabbed over the entire surface of the medium, rotating the plate 60 degrees after each application by using a sterile cotton swab, to ensure the spread of the tested microbes (108 CFU/ml) on the surface of the plate completely. The 6mm diameter of the well was made with borer on the agar plates. The DMSO dissolved biosurfactant was filled in well with the help of micropipette. Fifty μl of Ampicillin (10μg/ml) was used as positive control and 100μl of DMSO was added in to well, which was negative control.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

 

Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem in the worldwide and emerged as one of the foremost problems in public health concerns of the 21st century. Among the different types of resistant mechanism, Beta-lactamases are the most important mechanism of drug resistance among Gram-negative bacteria (Serife, 2013). This fact was due to the selective pressure imposed by inappropriate use of third generation cephalosporins.

The most commonly isolated uropathogen was Escherichia coli, second most were Klebsiella spp and Enterobacter spp and followed other Gram negative organisms, such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Proteus spp, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mostly, those diagnosed UTI isolates are positive for ESBL (Pooja et al., 2017). In complicated UTIs, Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more common with antibiotic resistance (Getenet and wondewosen, 2011).

            The increased prevalence of ESBL producing bacteria make an unavoidable phenomenon, Worldwide, UTIs due to ESBL-producing bacteria are an important part of this problem (John et al., 2013). These ESBL-producing bacteria are difficult to resolve due to various reasons, difficulty in detecting ESBL production and inconsistencies in reporting (Steward et al., 2000). Different risk factors are associated with ESBL strains (Ejaz et al., 2009). Therefore action must be taken against this problem through a newer antimicrobial substance.

In this present study, totally 25 UTI isolates of P.aeruginosa were collected from clinical laboratory and subjected to determination of ESBL genes by PCR method. Among the 4 types of ESBL genes, TEM gene was observed on most of the isolates, second most was OXA and 2 isolates had CTXM and SHV genes. In this study, 4 isolates had 2 or more genes. These isolates were utilized for the inhibition activity (Plate.1).

The results of the present study were near to Omar et al., 2015, who reported four types of ESBL genes observed from clinical isolates of P.aeruginosa. Recently Agnieszka (2017) observed OXA gene from most of the clinical isolates. Different risk factors are associated with ESBL strains such as prolonged hospitalization, extended ICU stay and severity of illness (Ejaz, 2009). Therefore, investigations shall be carried out to battle against the development of antimicrobial resistant.

This study aimed to determine the ESBL producing P.aeruginosa and prompt the inhibitory activity with Bacillus producing biosurfactant. In our study, 15 bacterial isolates were isolated from petrochemical contaminated soil samples collected in Namakkal. The ability of 15 isolates to grow on medium containing Crude oil, which eventually proved their ability for biosurfactant production and any isolate which grow on NA plates containing hydrocarbons but failed to grow on the NA plate were confirmed as non-degraders.  Those 15 isolates were carried out for determination of efficient isolates by blue agar, oil spreading test and Emulsification test. Among the 15 isolates, 6 were positive for blue agar plate method.  The formation of insoluble ion pair precipitates in the agar plate containing methylene blue exhibited dark blue color against the light blue background.  While using the oil spreading technique, 7 isolates were able to displace the oil, it indicates that the bacterial isolates produce biosurfactant extracellularly. This oil spreading method was also studied by Priya et al., (2009), Anandaraj et al., (2010) and Jaysree et al., (2011). 

Emulsification activity is one of the criteria to determine the potential of biosurfactant. Emulsifying activities (E24) determined the productivity of bio emulsifier (Santhini and Parthasarathi, 2014). In our study, the highest Emulsification index (E24) value showed in SA12 isolate and followed by SA14 isolate. Therefore, SA12 isolate was selected as a potent isolate for biosurfactant production, this isolate showed positive results for Blue agar and oil spreading test.  The extracted, biosurfactant was utilized for the antibacterial activity against UTI isolates of P.aeruginosa. Simultaneously, the best isolate of SA12 was identified as B. cereus based on microscopic and biochemical analysis according to Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology.

Several biosurfactants exhibit antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activities, which make them relevant molecules for applications in combating many diseases and infections. For the last decades, a usage of biosurfactant was increased in the medical field. In 2009, Falagas and Makris were applying the biosurfactant on the medical devices (such as catheters and other medical insertional devices) for decreasing colonization by microorganisms responsible for nosocomial infections.

In this present study, potential isolates of Bacillus cereus was utilized for the production of biosurfactant and evaluated the antimicrobial activity. Among the 5 isolates of P.aeruginosa, 3 (60%) of were inhibited by biosurfactant and two of were resistance. The zone of inhibition ranged from 12mm to 22mm. In this study, different concentration of biosurfactant was utilized for determination of MIC; the 10mg/ml of concentration was inhibited to two isolates of P.aeruginosa. The inhibitory concentrations of sophorolipid, as shown in Table 1 and plate 2 were comparable to standard antibiotic. However, no inhibition of the cell growth for P.aeruginosa was observed.

Several biosurfactants that exhibited antimicrobial activity have been previously described. However, there are few reports about the antimicrobial activity of biosurfactants isolated from Bacillus species and active against UTI isolates of P.aeruginosa.

Most of the studies obtained from other species showed antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus agalactiae, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was achieved from 25mg/ml to 30mg/ml (Gomaa, 2012). In 2013, Salman et al observed that the crude biosurfactant isolated from S. thermophilus showed an inhibitory effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The previous studies of Gudina et al., (2010) also determined the antibacterial activity of biosurfactant against to UTI causing bacterial isolates.

The bacterial microbes were inhibited by different mechanisms of biosurfactant, such as disturb the membrane structure (Lotfabad et al., 2013), deterioration in the integrity of cell membranes, break down the nutrition cycle and prevent the protein synthesis (Gomaa et al., 2012). Chaisson 2003 reported that the biosurfactant inhibits the initiation of transcription by preventing the synthesis of RNAs larger than dinucleotides.

 

CONCLUSION 

The antimicrobial activity of biosurfactants has not been reviewed vast, especially against to UTI pathogenic bacteria. The present study shows that biosurfactants are a suitable alternative to the medical field for applications against ESBL producing UTI isolates of P.aeruginosa.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Agnieszka E. Laudy, 2017. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in Warsaw, Poland, detected by various phenotypic and genotypic methods. PLoS One., 12(6);e0180121.
  2. Anantharaj B Thivakaran P, 2010. Isolation and production of biosurfactant producing organism from oil spilled soil.JBiosci Tech., 1 (3);120-126.
  3. Chaisson, RE, 2003. Treatment of chronic infections with rifamycins: is resistance likely to follow? Antimicrob Agents Chemother., 47; 3037-3039.   
  4. Christova N, Tuleva B, Lalchev V, Jordnova A, Jordanov B. Rhamnolipid Biosurfactants Produced by Reni bacterium Salmoninarum 27BN During Growth on Hexadecane, 2004. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering., 59;70-74.
  5. Cooper DG, Goldenberg BG, 1987. Surface­active agents from two Bacillus species.  Appl. Env. Microbiol., 53; 224-­229. 
  6. Ejaz ahmed, durrani MA, Shafqat Q and Kharal SA, 2009. Detection of extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) producing organisms in enterobacteriaceae Family like Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae by double Disc diffusion method (DDDM). Pakistan Journal of Pharmacology., 26(1); 25-30.
  7. Falagas ME, Makris GC, 2009. Probiotic bacteria and biosurfactants for nosocomial infection control: a hypothesis. J Hosp Infect., 71; 301–306.
  8. Getenet Beyene and Wondewosen Tsegaye, 2011. Bacterial Uropathogens in Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci.,  21(2); 141–146.
  9. Gomaa EZ, 2012. Antimicrobial activity of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformisstrain M104 grown on whey. African Journal of Microbiology Research., 6(20); 4396-4403.
  10. Gudina EJ, Rocha V, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues, LR, 2010. Antimicrobial and antiadhesive properties of a biosurfactant isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei A20. The Society for Applied Microbiology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 50 ; 419–424.
  11. Hong Fang, Ferda Ataker, Göran Hedin and Kathrine Dornbusch, 2008. Molecular epidemiology of extendedspectrum β Lactamases among Escherichia coli isolates collected in a Swedish hospital and its associated health care facilities from 2001 to 2006, J Clin Microbiol., 46(2); 707–712.
  12. Jaysree RC, Basu S, Singh PP, Ghosal T, Patra AP, Keerthi Y, Rajendran N, 2011. Isolation of biosurfactant producing bacteria from environmental samples. Pharmacologyonline., 3; 1427-1433.
  13. John Dotis, Nikoleta Printza, Alexandra Marneri, Dimos Gidaris, Fotios Papachristou, 2013. Urinary tract infections caused by extended-spectrum betalactamase-producing bacteria in children: a matched casecontrol study. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics., 55; 571-574.
  14. Karanth NGK, Deo PG, Veenanadig NK, 1999. Microbial Production of Biosurfactants and Their Importance. Current Science., 77; 116 – 126.
  15. Latfabad TB, Shahcheraghi F, Shooraji F, 2013. Assessment of antibacterial capability of rhamnolipids produced by two indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Jundishapur J Microbiol., 6(1); 29-35.
  16. Magalhaes L, Nitschke M, 2013. Antimicrobial activity of rhamnolipids against Listeria monocytogenes and their synergistic interaction with nisin. Food Control., 29; 138–142.

17.Mamitha Kumar Subathra, Grasian Immanuel, and Albert Haridoss Suresh, 2013. Isolation and Identification of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria from Ennore creek. Bioinformation., 9(3); 150–157.

  1. Motta AS, Olivera FC, Brandelli A, 2004. Screening antimicrobial activity among bacteria isolated from the Amazon Basin Braz. J. Microbiol., 35 ;307-310.
  2. Nascimento GGF, Locatelli J, Freitas PC, Silva GL, 2000. Antibacterial activity of plant extracts and phytochemicals on antibiotic resistant Bacteria. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology., 31;247–256.
  3. Omar B Ahmed, Atif H Asghar, Fayez S Bahwerth, 2015. Prevalence of ESBL genes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from Makkah hospitals, Saudi arabia. European Journal of Biology and Medical Science Research.,3(6);12-18.
  4. Pooja Shakya, Dhiraj Shrestha, Elina Maharjan, Vijay K. Sharma and Rabin Paudyal, 2017. ESBL Production among E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Causing Urinary Tract Infection: A Hospital Based Study. The Open Microbiology Journal., 11; 23-30.
  5. Priya T, Usharani G, 2009. Comparative study for Biosurfactant production by using Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Botany Research International., 2(4); 284-287.
  6. Sadasivam S, Manickam A, 1996. Biochemical methods. 2nd edition, New Age International (p) Ltd. Publisher, New Delhi, pp 169–169.
  7. Salman JAS, Khalaf KJ, Al-Marjani MF, 2013. Study of inhibitory agents produced by Streptococcus thermophiles on growth and biofilm formation for some pathogenic bacteria. Journal of biotechnology research center., 7(2); 24-31.
  8. Santhini, Parthasarathi R, 2014. Isolation and Screening of Biosurfactant Producing Microorganisms from Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils from Automobile Workshop. International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archives., 5(2); 158 – 167.
  9. Serife Altun , Zeliha Kocak Tufan, Server Yagcl , Ufuk onde, Cemal Bulut, Sami Kınıkl and Ali Pekcan  Demiroz, 2013. Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamases, AmpC and Metallo Beta-lactamases in Emerging Multi-drug Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria in Intensive Care Units, 2(4);2-4.
  10. Siegmund I, Wagner F, 1991. New method for detecting rhamnolipids excreted by Pseudomonas species during growth on mineral agar. Biotechnol Tech., 5; 265-268.

 

 

 

 

How to cite this article

Madhumathi, B., Jegadeeshkumar, D., Anitha, M., Kannan, N., & Chandrasekaran. (2017). Evaluate the antimicrobial activity of Biosurfactant against ESBL producing bacterial isolates. Int. J. Agr. Life. Sci, 3(3), 208-213. doi: 10.22573/spg.ijals.017.s12200085.

 

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

“The authors declare no conflict of interest”.

                 

© 2017 by the authors; licensee SKY FOX Publishing Group, Tamilnadu, India. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

 

 

 

 

 

Table .1

Antibacterial activity of biosurfactant against ESBL producing P.aeruginosa

 

S.No

Isolates

Different concentration

Zone of inhibition in mm

10mg

15mg

20mg

25mg

DMSO

AMP

1.

Isolate 1

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.

Isolate 2

12

15

18

22

-

-

3.

Isolate 3

12

15

17

19

-

-

4.

Isolate 4

-

-

-

-

-

-

5.

Isolate 5

-

10

13

15

-

-