skyfox,journals,tamilnadu
Home | About Us

open access journals
open access journals
Research Article

Effect of canning on the canning attributes and proximate composition of Bruchid Resistant, Maz-type common bean Lines

Milkesa Feyera1* and Mulugeta Teamir 2
Published 31-03-2024

DOI

https://doi.org/10.22573/spg.ijals.024.s122000119

AUTHOR AFFILIATION

1Melkassa Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia
2Ministry of Agriculture, Ethiopia

ABSTRACT

Screening of bean lines for canning attributes and proximate composition is an important input for the food industry, bean researchers, and other end users. The objective of this study was to evaluate Maz-Lines common beans for their canning quality and proximate composition. Three Maz-type common bean lines were subjected to nine different canning treatments. Canning attributes and proximate composition of those maz-type canned common beans were evaluated using standard official methods. The result showed that maz-type common bean lines and the canning process significantly affected canning attributes. Consequently, the percentage of washed-drained weight ranged from 64.80 to 73.17% and 67.23 to 70.97% due to the effects of different canning treatments and maz-common bean lines, respectively. The result indicated the hydration coefficient varied from 1.03 to 1.05. The degree of clumping, appearance, splitting degree, and starchiness were also determined by the visual rating procedure. The result of those visual ratings of all three Maz-type common beans revealed promising canning quality traits. Good canning quality was obtained in a sample soaked for 40 minutes at ambient temperature, followed by blanching for 40 minutes at 75 degree C. The canning process caused an increase in crude protein, crude fat, total carbohydrate, and energy values in canned beans. However, the moisture and crude fiber contents of canned beans decreased as a result of varied canning treatments. It can be concluded that canning attributes and some proximate composition of the Maz-type common bean line were improved by the canning process.

Article Menu


KEYWORDS

Blanching, Canning, Soaking, Protein, hydration coefficient
This article has no figures to display.
  1. Afoakwa, E. O., Yenyi, S. E., and Sakyi-Dawson, E. (2006). Response surface methodology for optimizing the pre-processing conditions during canning of a newly developed and promising cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) variety. Journal of Food Engineering, 73(4), 346-357.
  2. Alozie, Y. E., Iyam, M. A., Lawal, O., Udofia, U., and Ani, I. F. (2009). Utilization of Bambara Groundnut Flour blends in bread production. Journal of Food Technology, 7 (4), 111-114.
  3. (2005). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Method of Analysis of AOAC International. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Washington DC, USA
  4. (2000).  Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of the AOAC (18th ed.). Washington DC: USA.
  5. Balasubramanian, P. (1998). Processing variables, genotype, environment and their effect on canning quality of common bean. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Crop and Horticulture Sciences and Plant Ecology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK. 117 pp.
  6. Balasubramanian, P., Slinkard, A., Tyler, R. and Vandenberg, A. (1999). Genotype and environment effect on canning quality of dry bean grown in Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of plant science, 79(3), pp.335-342.
  7. Balasubramanian, P., Slinkard, A., Tyler, R. and Vandenberg, A. (2000). A modified laboratory canning protocol for quality evaluation of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 80(6), pp732-738.
  8. Dabel N, Igbabul BD, Amove J, Iorliam B. (2016). Nutritional Composition, physical and sensory properties of cookies from Wheat, Acha and Mung Bean Composite Flour. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5(6) 401-406
  9. Daleen van der Mrwe, Garry Osthoff and Apie Pretorius. (2006). Comparison of the canning quality of small white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) canned in tomato sauce by a small-scale and an industrial method. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86, 1046-1056.
  10. De Lima Sampaio, S., M. Suarez-Recio and I. Aguilo-Aguayo.(2022). Influence of Canning on Food Bioactives. In Retention of Bioactives in Food Processing pp, 177-202. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  11. Derese Mekonnen and Shimelis Admassu. (2012). Canning Quality Evaluation of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Varieties Grown in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, Volume 6 (1), 65-78
  12. Joshi, A.U., Liu, C. and Sathe, S.K. (2015). Functional properties of select seed flours. Food Science and Technology 60(1), 325-331.
  13. Elmaki, H.B., Abdelrahaman, S.M., Idris, W.H., Hassan, A.B., Babiker, E.E. & El Tinay, A.H. (2007). Content of antinutritional factors and HCl-extractability of minerals from white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars: influence of soaking and ⁄ or cooking. Food Chemistry, 100, 362–368.
  14. Guyot, J.P., Rochette, I. and Treche, S. (2007). Effect of fermentation by amylolytic lactic acid bacteria, in process combinations, on characteristics of rice/soybean slurries: A new method for preparing high energy density complementary foods for young children. Food Chemistry, 100, 623–63
  15. Hosfield, G.L. (1991). Genetic control of production and food quality factors in dry bean. Food technology (USA).
  16. Khanal, R., A. J. Burt, L. Woodrow, P. Balasubramanian, and A. Navabi. (2014). “Genotypic Association of Parameters Commonly Used to Predict Canning Quality of Dry Bean.” Crop Science, 54, 2564–2573.
  17. Minuye and Bajo. (2021). Common beans variability on physical, canning quality, nutritional, mineral, and phytate contents. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 7(1), pp1914376.
  18. Pedrosa, M.M., Cuadrado, C., Burbano, C., Muzquiz, M., Cabellos, B., Olmedilla-Alonso, B. and Asensio-Vegas, C. (2015). Effects of industrial canning on the proximate composition, bioactive compounds contents and nutritional profile of two Spanish common dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Chemistry, 166, pp68-75.
  19. Van Der Merwe, D., Osthoff, G. and Pretorius, A.J. (2006). Evaluation and standardization of small‐scale canning methods for small white beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) canned in tomato sauce. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86(7), pp1115-1124.
  20. Varner G.V and Uebersax M.A. (1995). Research Report. Michigan Dry Bean Digest 19, 22-23.
  21. Serrem, C. A. (2011). Development of soy fortified sorghum and bread wheat biscuits as a supplementary food to combat Protein Energy Malnutrition in young children(Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria).
  22. Kumar, Y., Basu, S., Goswami, D., Devi, M., Shivhare, U. S., and Vishwakarma, R. K. (2022). Anti‐nutritional compounds in pulses: Implications and alleviation methods. Legume Science, 4(2), e111.
  23. Kan L., Nie S., Hu J., Wang S., Bai Z., Wang J., Zhou Y., Jiang J., Zeng Q., Song K. (2018). Comparative study on the chemical composition, anthocyanins, tocopherols and carotenoids of selected legumes. Food Chem. 2018;260:317–326. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem. 03.148. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carbas, B., Machado, N., Oppolzer, D., Ferreira, L., Queiroz, M., Brites, C., ... & Barros, A. I. (2020). Nutrients, antinutrients, phenolic composition, and antioxidant activity of common bean cultivars and their potential for food applications. Antioxidants, 9(2), 186.
  25. Wang N., Hatcher D.W., Tyler R.T., Toews R., Gawalko E.J. (2010). Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) Food Res. Int. 2010;43:589–594. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.07.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
  26. Tigist, S. G., Melis, R., Sibiya, J., & Keneni, G.(2018). Evaluation of different Ethiopian common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris (Fabaceae) genotypes for host resistance to the Mexican bean weevil, Zabrotes subfasciatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758417000248
  27. Barman, A., Marak, C. M., Barman, R. M., & Sangma, C. S. (2018). Nutraceutical properties of legume seeds and their impact on human health. In Legume seed nutraceutical research. IntechOpen.

ARTICLE HISTORY

Received: 06 Jan 2024/ Revised: 21 Jan 2024/ Accepted: 24 Feb 2024/ Published: 31 Mar 2024

COPYRIGHT

© 2024 Feyera et al., This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

Feyera, M., & Teamir, M. (2024). Effect of canning on the canning attributes and proximate composition of Bruchid Resistant, Maz-type common bean Lines. Int J Agric Life Sci, 10(1), 428-433. doi: 10.22573/spg.ijals.024.s122000119


Cite Metrics
© Copyright – Skyfox Publishing Group. A Division of Skyfox Research Foundation a not-for-profit publisher