Exogenous chemical mediated induction of salt tolerance in Soybean plants

Authors

  • Anukool Vaishnav Department of Biological Science, College of Arts, Science & Humanities (CASH), Mody University of Science &Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar 332311, Rajasthan (India)
  • Sarita Kumari Department of Biosciences, College of Arts, Science & Humanities (CASH), Mody University of Science & Technology, Lakshmangarh-332311, Rajasthan, India
  • Shekhar Jain Department of Biosciences, College of Arts, Science & Humanities (CASH), Mody University of Science & Technology, Lakshmangarh-332311, Rajasthan, India
  • Devendra Kumar Choudhary Amity Institute of Microbial Technology (AIMT), Block ‘E-3’, 4th Floor, Amity University Campus, Sector-125, Noida-201303, Gautam Buddha Nagar, UP (India)
  • Kanti Prakash Sharma Department of Biosciences, College of Arts, Science & Humanities (CASH), Mody University of Science & Technology, Lakshmangarh-332311, Rajasthan, India

Keywords:

Nitric oxide, Priming, Salinity, Soybean, Sodium nitroprusside

Abstract

To evaluate the potential of seed priming tools in soybean salt stress tolerance with improved plant growth and biomass content. Soybean seeds were primed with 5 different priming agents (proline, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), glycienbetaine, hydrogen peroxide & mannitol) then germination under laboratory conditions using 100mM NaCl stress condition was evaluated. Results indicated that SNP (nitric oxide donor) was found most effective agent for growth promotion, while unprimed treatment decreased germination, growth and biomass related parameters. SNP-primed seeds had a higher germination percentage (82%) and seedlings were exhibited increased proline content (105%) as compared to unprimed treatment. The protective mechanism of SNP against oxidative stress was correlated with lower lipid peroxidation (MDA content). Notably, the ability to maintain biomass level (41% reduction) as well as chlorophyll content indicated a role of SNP in alleviation of salt stress and induce tolerance. Altogether, our results highlight that exogenously SNP could be employed to attain better growth and development of soybean and perhaps other legumes under salt stress.

References

Banu MNA, Hoque MA, Watanabe-Sugimoto M, Matsuoka K, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, Murataa Y, 2009. Proline and glycinebetaine induce antioxidant defense gene expression and suppress cell death in cultured tobacco cells under salt stress. J Plant Physiol. 166:146–156.

Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID, 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water- stress studies. Plant Soil. 39: 205-207.

Ben Rejeb I, Atauri Miranda L, Cordier M, Mauch-Mani B, 2013. Induced tolerance and priming for abiotic stress in plants. In: Gaur, R. K., & Sharma, P. (Eds.) Molecular Approaches in Plant Abiotic Stress, CRC Press

Fu J, Chu X, Sun Y, Miao Y, Xu Y, Hu T, 2015. Nitric oxide mediates 5-aminolevulinic acid induced antioxidant defense in leaves of Elymus nutans griseb. exposed to chilling stress. PLoS ONE. 10: e0130367.

Harb A, Pereira A, 2011. Screening Arabidopsis genotypes for drought stress resistance. Methods. Mol Biol. 678: 191–198.

Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Fujita M, 2013. Plant response to salt stress and role of exogenous protectants to mitigate salt-induced damages. In: P. Ahmad et al. (eds.), Ecophysiology and responses of plants under salt stress. Springer New York, pp 25-87.

Hodges DM, Delong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK, 1999. Improving the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissue containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta. 207: 604–611.

Jamil A, Riaz S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR, 2011. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 30: 435–458.

Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR, 1985. Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls A and B of Leaf in Different Solvents. Biol Soc Trans. 11:591-592.

Manchanda G, Garg N, 2008. Salinity and its effects on the functional biology of legumes. Acta Physiol Plantarum. 30: 595-618.

Munns R, Tester M, 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 59: 651–681.

Pastor V, Luna E, Mauch-Mani B, Ton J, Flors V, 2013. Primed plants do not forget. Environ Exp Bot. 94: 46–56.

Singh A, Nath Panda S, Flugel WA, Krause P, 2012. Waterlogging and farmland salinisation: causes and remedial measures in an irrigated semi‐arid region of India. Irrig Drain. 61: 357-365.

Singh AP, Dixit G, Kumar A, Mishra S, Singh PK, Dwivedi S, Trivedi PK, Chakrabarty D, Mallick S, Pandey V, Dhankher OP, Tripathi RD, 2016. Nitric oxide alleviated arsenic toxicity by modulation of antioxidants and thiol metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 6:1272.

Tanou G, Fotopoulos V, Molassiotis A, 2012. Priming against environmental challenges and proteomics in plants: update and agricultural perspectives. Front Plant Sci. 3: 216.

Tufan Oz M, Eyidogan F, Yucel M, Öktem HA, 2015. Functional role of nitric oxide under abiotic stress conditions. In: Khan MN (ed) Nitric oxide action in abiotic stress responses in plants. Springer International Publishing, pp 21-41.

Wellburn AR, 1994. The spectral determination of chlorophylls A and B, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol. 144: 307-31.

Wu XX, Zhu WM, Zhang H et al., 2011. Exogenous nitric oxide protects against salt-induced oxidative stress in the leaves from two genotypes of tomato (Lycopersicom esculentum Mill.). Acta Physiol Plant. 33: 1199–1209.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2016

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Exogenous chemical mediated induction of salt tolerance in Soybean plants. (2016). International Journal of Agricultural and Life Sciences, 2(3), 43-47. https://skyfox.co/ijals/index.php/als/article/view/13